Best electronic cigarette

By reading ‘s e cigarette reviews, you can save yourself the hassle of trying multiple brands and hopefully get the brand that fits your personality and budget from the get go. Our e cigarette guide, Darren, does his best to dissect every brand on the market by sharing his first hand experiences.

It seems everyone is moving t0 e cigs, mostly because of the terrible health risks associated with smoking.

Now you are ready to get yourself your first electronic cigarette but as soon as you hit the internet or your local shop, you are presented with hundreds of different products and flavors. What do you pick? What is the best for you? Hopefully, all these questions will be answered in our comprehensive e cig buyers guide.

The right manufacturer

The Bull Smoke brand is one of the more popular e cigarette brands. Their tagline is «More Vapor. No Bull.»

The increasing popularity of electronic cigarettes amongst American citizens has caused several companies to come into the electronic cigarette business, each offering a unique version of the basic electronic cigarette and a variety of flavors to pick from. The first thing you must decide is a brand. Each and every brand has a unique product and flavors to go with. So the only way you can come to a conclusion is to actually have enough knowledge about the manufacturer. This is where electronic cigarette reviews will thoroughly help you out. Read the reviews see what people are saying about each brand. This is a very important step that you must take in order to learn about a brand and its benefits. You should easily be able to relate to hundreds of people on the internet who share the same passion of getting the best electronic cigarette as you.

Compare starter kits

Nearly every manufacturer lets users pick a starter kit when they want to try the brand out. You must compare all the starter kits from shortlisted brands in order to obtain the best value possible. In my opinion, always go for a starter kit that offers you the basic stuff you need to get started. Most starter kits will include extras like a carrying case or other fancy accessories. Try and ignore these for your first kit. You simply need to get a kit that allows you to have a battery, a cartomizer, a flavor and a charger to charge the battery. Anything other than these is an extra that should be avoided before you become a permanent customer of a brand.

Look for the right flavors

Okay so this is the trickiest part. There are several manufacturers and each offer at least five different flavors to choose from. While some of these flavors are similar in nature, most are brand exclusives. So if you are the adventurous type, don t hesitate to pick a brand that offers unique flavors. But if you just want to stick to the traditional tobacco flavor, you can go with any brand. But keep in mind that there are even brands that offer different tobacco flavors. The general aim is to get a tobacco flavor that best compliments your paper cigarette flavor.

Choose the right battery

If you are a starter, you should simply go for an automatic battery. This battery was designed with convenience in mind. The automatic battery does not require you to push a button to turn the cigarette on, instead, as soon as you puff on a cigarette, vapor is produced and you can inhale it. If you are one of those curious people who can t go on without discovering new things, feel free to add in a manual battery in your starter kit. Most manufacturers will give you two batteries to start with, so don t hesitate to add in a manual and automatic battery into your list.

Select the right nicotine strength

Generally, there are four different nicotine strengths available. You must determine the strength of the nicotine based on your paper cigarette needs. If you find that you are a heavy smoker, you should pick the highest nicotine strength available from a manufacturer. If you are in only because you want to permanently get away from smoking cigarettes or vaping electronic cigarettes, then start by taking low nicotine and move to zero nicotine.

A few of the more popular brands out there on the market are the V2 Cigs brand and the unforgettable Bull Smoke. If you are brand new to e cigarette smoking, those are the brands you should check out before all others.

Smokers are addicted to the branding of their cigarettes

As much as the connection between cigarettes and irreverent cool has been hammered into our collective psyche, it turns out it can quickly be outdone One year after a law passed in 2012 mandating that home grown tobacco be packaged plainly with huge health warnings, researchers have found that smokers of the plain cigarettes are more likely to perceive the experience as less satisfying than those who smoke the branded kind.

In 2012, Australia became the first country to demand that its domestic cigarettes be placed in plain, brown packaging, with gruesome health warnings taking up 75% of the box. Before the law was enforced, some cigarette companies experimented with slight alterations. One company, called British American Tobacco Australia, printed the line, «It s what s inside that counts,» on the lid, much to the ire of the Australian government.

But in the months during the country s transitional period between branded and plain packaging, a survey of 536 Australian smokers found that 30% of the plain pack smokers perceived the quality of their cigarettes as lower, compared to 20.1% of branded cigarette smokers. More than 26% of plain packers reported less satisfaction with their unchanged cigarettes, compared to 14.9% of the brand loyalists.

One of the authors of the study, Melanie Wakefield, who is also director of the Centre for Behavioral Research in Cancer in Victoria, suggested in a 2007 paper that cigarette branding alone created a set of self fulfilled expectations, or «halo» effect. «The wider consumer marketing literature shows convincingly that the taste of food and drinks is able to be manipulated by branding and labeling,» she wrote. «The expectation influences how a person thinks a product might taste, which then influences one s taste perceptions and liking when the product is actually consumed.»

Researchers at the Centre also looked at how smokers viewed the government s heavy handed attempt to influence their habit. But of the plain pack smokers, only 32.3% of people saw the dangers of smoking as «exaggerated,» compared to 30.9% of the branded smokers. Even more significant was the fact that some 46% of plain pack smokers had thought about the negative effects of smoking often in the week leading up to the survey, while only 36% of branded pack users did the same. Some 68.8% of the plain pack smokers reported that they were seriously considering quitting in the next six months, compared to 57.1% of brand loyal smokers.

But what if brand loyal smokers were less likely to be swayed by public health messaging in the first place? As the study notes, «some of the relationships found between pack type and quitting outcomes could be due to those more interested in quitting being less likely to avoid or even to seek out the plain packs.» Still, almost 75% of smokers in the representative sample the vast majority were smoking from the plain packs as tobacco companies shifted to the new rule.

«Even if avoidance among those not initially interested in quitting did occur, it may actually contribute to increased quitting thoughts and activity, resulting in a positive net effect of plain packaging when combined with the overall effect of smoking from a plain pack,» Wakefield tells

The British government had been considering a similar model based on Australia s, but decided to chuck the decision in May. In the lead up to the abandoned proposal, the Guardian reported that the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) one of America s most powerful, corporate backed lobbying groups supported by the Koch brothers had begun pressuring the U.K. and other countries that were considering plain packaging.

«There is no compelling evidence that the Plain Packaging proposal will achieve its stated objectives to reduce the initiation of tobacco use and overall tobacco consumption and to remove the package s ability to mislead and deceive consumers,» the group wrote in a press release opposing the Australian law in 2011. ALEC also added that plain packaging would exploit «the poor, elderly and most dependent smokers» in the Australian government s dastardly plan to improve health outcomes.

Not so, according to the Australian study. «While further research is needed to assess the long term effects on smokers as well as effects on youth, the introductory effects we observed are consistent with the broad objectives of the legislation,» Wakefield says.