The eu should not impose medicinal regulations on electronic cigarettes or e liquid.

The proposed tobacco products directive contains legislation that would classify all nicotine containing products as medicines, to be regulated as such. This would severely stunt the growth of the existing electronic cigarette industry due to financial burdens and is a disproportionate measure to take to ensure consumer safety of products such as electronic cigarettes. The food industry faces similar product safety issues and is regulated to ensure consumer safety in a much more proportionate manner. Inspections of premises, batch testing, traceability etc can all be addressed without the medicinalisation of ecigs.

Considering that the TPD is supposed to assist in the fight against health problems related to smoking, it seems a little odd to pass a legislation, that would effectively halt the growth and distribution of a product that clearly demonstrates to be an effective, healthier alternative to tobacco smoking, that has helped millions continue to consume moderate and safe levels of nicotine, whilst avoiding the health issues associated with tobacco smoking.

Users of ecigs are consumers, not patients and the natural move of people away from smoking (the aim of the TPD) would be severely hampered by disproportionate regulations leading to stigmatising users as patients, when all they are doing is enjoying moderate use of a substance that is not harmful at the low amounts that are in ecigs. In a similar way to how moderate use of coffee, alcohol etc, is accepted as standard, I believe that users of ecigs should also be allowed to remain as consumers and take control of their health without the intervention of medical professionals, who could well put people off ever trying the healthier alternative to smoking tobacco in the first place.

With 20000 people a year in the UK taking up smoking tobacco, consumers need a healthier alternative. The unecessary cost of medical regulations is millions for each SME and will kill the existing industry.

The rest of the story: tobacco news analysis and commentary: eu parliament rejects de facto ban on electronic cigarettes; tide starting to turn

The EU parliament has rejected the provisions of the Tobacco Product Directive that would have regulated electronic cigarettes as drugs, thus essentially removing them from the market or making it extremely difficult for them to compete as an alternative to real cigarettes.

According to an article in the Globe and Mail «Legislators also voted for new limits on advertising for electronic cigarettes, but rejected a measure that would have restricted them to medical use only. The battery operated products, which are enjoying a boom in the United States and many European countries, turn nicotine into a vapour inhaled by the user and are often marketed as a less harmful alternative to tobacco. Many health experts say e cigarettes are useful for people trying to quit or cut down on nicotine.»

«Armando Peruga, a tobacco control expert at WHO in Geneva, said regulating e cigarettes wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing and that WHO is currently evaluating their safety and effectiveness. «We do think e cigarettes could be useful, but we need more information. We have not yet ruled them out. We do think they could be helpful for some smokers.»»

The Rest of the Story

The tide is starting to turn, as evidenced not only by the EU Parliament’s decision to allow electronic cigarettes to compete with tobacco cigarettes, but also by the complete change in the WHO’s position on these products. The WHO had previously blasted electronic cigarettes and recommended strongly against their use. Now, however, the WHO actually opines that electronic cigarettes could be helpful for some smokers.

What caused this turn of events and the turning of the tide regarding opinion on electronic cigarettes?

The answer is …

… the vaping community.

It is the actual users of these products who are responsible for the changing attitudes toward electronic cigarettes, including the EU Parliament’s rejection of the de facto e cigarette ban and the WHO’s change of heart on e cigarettes.

The voices of the actual people who use these products have drowned out the ideological hysteria of anti smoking groups and officials.

The vaping community is to be congratulated because it has been successful in building a movement in which its voice can be heard. The many vaping forums, advocacy actions, and advocacy groups, and the public presence of vapers has made the difference by showing policy makers that while anti smoking groups continue to talk about theoretical people who don’t exist, there are tens of thousands of people who do exist and who are benefiting from these products.

This reminds me of a pet peeve of mine. I hate when I’m sitting in a restaurant waiting for a long time to be served and the restaurant staff is busy setting the other tables for people who have not yet arrived. While they meticulously set the table for hypothetical customers who may or may not arrive, there are actual customers in the establishment right now who need service.

The anti smoking groups are acting like those restaurant staff. While they use scare mongering to get policy makers to worry about the hypothetical people who don’t yet exist smokers who would otherwise quit if not for e cigarettes and youth smokers who initiated because of e cigarette use they are ignoring the tens of thousands of people who have improved their health and possibly saved their lives because of electronic cigarettes.

Fortunately, hearing from actual people who have benefited from these products is drowning out the complaints of anti smoking groups about the hypothetical possibilities that have not yet occurred. Nearly every proposed ban on electronic cigarettes has so far been defeated, largely because the vaping community has spoken out and when policy makers have heard what these products are doing for smokers, they have seen the light and decided not to restrict the ability of these ex smokers to remain ex smokers.

Has the FDA also heard the voices of the vaping community? We’ll find out momentarily, as the proposed regulations should be released shortly.

In the meantime, the vaping community should take time to celebrate its accomplishments. It has overcome quite a formidable lobby, one that for some reason has forsaken the public’s health to ensure that society does not condone a behavior that looks like smoking, even though it is saving lives.


4 комментария to “The eu should not impose medicinal regulations on electronic cigarettes or e liquid.”

  1. e information at your own risk and we can’t accept liability if things go wrong. This info does not constitute financial advice, always do your own research on top to ensure it’s right for your specific circumstances and remember we focus on rates not service. We don’t as a general policy investig

    • oday PA The European Parliament in Strasbourg voted on a raft of measures to help curb smoking but stopped short of introducing plain packaging for cigarettes and tobacco. Legislators put new limits on advertising for electronic cigarettes but have so far rejected proposals for them to be regarded a

  2. g this mistake? We re fixing it by rearresting freed men. More than a dozen former inmates have been rounded up since June, as the state rearrests those who still should be in prison today. How s this for the luck of the draw? If you were released a year early in December 2011, you remain free. But

  3. 9 21. Ohio $6.22 20. Minnesota $6.53 19. Maryland $6.70 18. Pennsylvania $6.80 17. Arizona $6.87 16. New Mexico $6.88 15. Michigan $6.90 14. Utah $7.22 13. Maine $7.97 12. Washington, D.C. $7.99 11. Wisconsin $8.11 10. Vermont $8.23 9. Connecticut $8.25 8. Massachusetts $8.30 7. New Jersey $8.35 6.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.