The fallacy of “light” cigarettes

Just 40 years ago, the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health alerted the American public to the health risks of cigarette smoking. It launched a remarkably successful public health campaign that dramatically cut adult smoking prevalence, from 42.4% in 1965 to 22.8% in 2001, and recast the cultural acceptability of tobacco use.1 Less well known is the fact that the cigarette itself has undergone major change in the past 40 years. Today’s 46.2 million American smokers buy a product very different from the cigarette sold in 1964.

In the late 1960s, tobacco manufacturers introduced light or low tar brands that yielded 7 14 mg tar per cigarette, compared to the 22 mg tar of the average cigarette sold at that time.2 Later, ultralight brands appeared, with tar yields below 7 mg per cigarette. Today, almost 90% of cigarettes sold in the United States are in these categories.3 Better taste is not the reason why smokers buy light cigarettes. They buy them because they have the misconception that smoking lower tar products reduces their risk of lung cancer and other tobacco related diseases.4 Advertisements for these

Jama network

Cannabis use may increase the likelihood of becoming addicted to nicotine, suggests a study in rats funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Data from previous epidemiologic studies have suggested that people who smoke marijuana are more likely to become addicted to cigarettes, but the reason why was unclear.

To probe whether biological factors may be involved, the researchers injected rats with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive component of cannabis, for 3 days (Panlilio LV et al. Neuropsychopharmacology. doi 10.1038/npp.2013.16 published online January 10, 2013 ). A week later the investigators implanted catheters in the animals to give them an intravenous dose of nicotine or a placebo when they completed a task. Of rats in the nicotine group, 94% learned to complete the task to get their dose, compared with 65% of the placebo group. When the rats had to work harder to obtain the dose, those in the nicotine group were more likely to persist.


4 комментария to “The fallacy of “light” cigarettes”

  1. vailable I reckon they must have been one of the most successful brands on the market. This is exactly what’ll happen with this half baked idea. Pete, London <br clear "all" />Vogue (cigarette) — wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    • P3 cart View MP3 Cart 30 4 Don’t Wanna Hear It 2 59 $0.00 $1.29 In MP3 cart View MP3 Cart 30 5 Demons Don’t Get Me Down 3 55 $0.00 $1.29 In MP3 cart View MP3 Cart 30 6 Murder Of Crows 4 39 $0.00 $1.29 In MP3 cart View MP3 Cart 30 7 Heaven Has No Vacancy 3 51 $0.00 $1.29 In MP3 cart View MP3 Cart 30

  2. ,"minute" "4 58 pm","short" "8 /11" ,"authors" "id" 221794754,"url" "http / / /author /nolan feeney /","name" "Nolan Feeney","bio" "Nolan Feeney is a reporter covering culture, entertainment and breaking news for TIME in New York City. He has also written for The Atlantic, Forbes, Entertainment Week

  3. g and product, updated branding at all stores, social media, etc. Please note that product remains unchanged with the same quality one can expect from our company. Merriam Webster "Wizard World Philly Spike PALz". RTM News. 2005 05 12. Smith, Gabe (1998 10 02). "Fox mystery drags on". The Michigan D

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.